From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 18:19:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9283216A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:19:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1287743D58 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:19:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAA57A403; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4177FD9B.8010805@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:19:07 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Sysoev References: <49035.1098044385@monkeys.com> <20041020233952.V17688@is.park.rambler.ru> <4176DAB5.5020302@elischer.org> <20041021095322.Y17688@is.park.rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041021095322.Y17688@is.park.rambler.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: aio_connect ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:19:12 -0000 I meant under 5.3, we could implement aio as a part of the library and have it create per process kernel threads to go do all the work.. (hiding this from the user) Igor Sysoev wrote: >On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >>Now that we have real threads, it shuld be possible to write an aio >>library that is >> implemented by having a bunch of underlying threads.. >> >> > >Do you mean the kernel only threads when the single threaded user process >has several threads in kernel ? As I understand FreeBSD 4.x already >has similar AIO implementation. > >Or do you mean the implementaion by user-level threads like in Solaris ? > > >Igor Sysoev >http://sysoev.ru/en/ > >