From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 20:34:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A16716A4CE for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:34:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (outmx011.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2142243D53 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brvdboss@spymac.com) Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i72KXr48001193 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:33:53 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from Noisy.localdomain.local (248.119-200-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.200.119.248])with SMTP id i72KXpf2001181 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:33:51 +0200 (envelope-from ) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:34:14 +0200 From: Bruno Van Den Bossche To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040802223414.164e3a64.brvdboss@spymac.com> Organization: Me, Myself & I X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Update eclipse-pmd port and eclipse-plugin port conventions X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:34:03 -0000 Hello I (finally) got to upgrading the eclipse-pmd port. With the new version and Eclipse3 being imported in to the tree some things changed. The pmd-plugin now "requires" to be installed from the GUI (default installation instructions). But this doesn't do much more then just copying the files around. The port skeleton can be found here A new release is planned for next week, so I should probably wait for that one to send my update-pr. But I would appreciate if someone would care to review the current version. I'd also like to know if there are any conventions about port-naming for plugins. (for eclipse, or in general) If not, should there be such conventions? For example always use eclipse-pluginname. greetings -- Bruno New crypt. See /usr/news/crypt.