From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 4 01:04:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA19073 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 01:04:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from enterprise.sanyusan.se (enterprise.sanyusan.se [195.24.160.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA19068 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 01:04:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from synker@enterprise.sanyusan.se) Received: (from synker@localhost) by enterprise.sanyusan.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14802 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:03:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from synker) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:03:16 +0100 From: synker To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Update bootblocks with dedicated disks? Message-ID: <19990104100315.B14764@sanyusan.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any difference in updating my boot blocks because I run all my machines with 'dangerously dedicated' disks. Or could I just follow Robert Nordier's boot.txt? When I installed my boxes I choosed dedicated disks and just marked the root disks bootable during setup. Myabe this is not the right place for this question but I am not sure where to ask it otherwise. My machines run, -current, -stable, 3.0-RELEASE, 2.2.5-RELEASE. === synker - synker@sanyusan.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message