Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 23:56:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: uboot@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 266404] sysutils/edk2: on aarch64, edk2 fails to build for FreeBSD aarch64 libgcc_s.so.1 issues Message-ID: <bug-266404-39090-82txxxCAPn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-266404-39090@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-266404-39090@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D266404 Bob Prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fbsd@www.zefox.net --- Comment #25 from Bob Prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> --- As possibly one of the "not a large number" of folks playing with edk2, I'll offer a couple of thoughts: My interest in EDK2 was stimulated by difficulties using u-boot, in particular what looked like USB disk discovery failures that were not readiy diagnosable with u-boot. It appeared for a time as if EDK2 might be a more tractable alternative. Mark revealed more of the debugging features of u-boot and the existence of EDK2. Additionally he has explained how to make EDK2 compile for Pi3 under poudriere. Meanwhile, it looks as if most of the disk discovery problems have been fixed by HPS's patches to FreeBSD's USB system. USB disk discovery is still imperfect, but it's usable now. U-boot seems inferior to the FreeBSD boot manager from i386 days. If EDK2 has potential as an alternative to u-boot it appears desirable to encourage development. At the very least having man pages for either port would be helpful.=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20 Thanks for reading, bob prohaska --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-266404-39090-82txxxCAPn>