Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 17:15:04 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@render.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ldconfig problem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961009171423.10204j-100000@minnow.render.com> In-Reply-To: <199610091533.IAA23308@austin.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Oct 1996, John Polstra wrote: > > Successful one: > > > > /usr/local/bin/kaffe: > > -lkaffe_vm.0 => /usr/local/lib/libkaffe_vm.so.0.5 (0x801d000) > > -lm.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2.0 (0x803e000) > > -lc.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3.0 (0x8055000) > > > > > > > > Unsuccessful one: > > > > /usr/local/bin/kaffe: > > -lkaffe_vm.0 => /usr/local/lib/libkaffe_vm.so.0.5 (0x801e000) > > -lm.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2.0 (0x803f000) > > -lc.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3.0 (0x8056000) > > Hmm, these both look OK. The shared libraries in the second case are > mapped one page higher than in the first case, but that doesn't indicate > a problem. Before mapping any shared libraries, the dynamic linker maps > the entire "/var/run/ld.so.hints" file into memory. In the second case, > that file is probably one page larger than in the first case, because it > has the extra libraries from "/usr/local/lib/m3/FreeBSD2" in it. > > Does kaffe use dlopen(), or LD_PRELOAD, or any other unusual features > of the dynamic linker? I think kaffe uses dlopen to load shared library implementations of native Java classes. -- Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 734 3761 FAX: +44 171 734 6426
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.961009171423.10204j-100000>