From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 8 5:39:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us [24.124.26.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251137B440 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 05:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (crashtest.boneyard [192.168.101.6]) by madeline.boneyard.lawrence.ks.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g38Cd2X94215 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 07:39:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd-sec@boneyard.lawrence.ks.us) Message-ID: <3CB18F66.1060304@boneyard.lawrence.ks.us> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 07:39:02 -0500 From: "Stephen D. Spencer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020326 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Centralized authentication References: <874riov1et.wl@delta.meridian-enviro.com> <002401c1ddf7$557e84a0$13ed7ad1@unstable.org> <20020406220150.C2867@rain.macguire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Benjamin Krueger wrote: > > I'd highly suggest the oft-little understood but incredibly deserving > Kerberos. I truly believe that if it were better documented and understood by > the masses of administrators out there, it would blow away current network > authentication systems. Heck, Microsoft used it to totally revitalize their > network authentication scheme to enormous benefit. Sadly, they then broke it > for anyone who isn't them. > Though this is not from personal experience, I believe that K5 has been 'adjusted' to cohabitate correctly with the M$ implementation. -Stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message