From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 12 3:29: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988B15705 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 03:29:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA17420; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:27:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Jason Thorpe Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Tony Finch , kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu, Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite References: <199908121025.DAA06011@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Aug 1999 12:27:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: Jason Thorpe's message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 03:25:00 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jason Thorpe writes: > On 12 Aug 1999 11:01:06 +0200 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > This prevents you from relicensing BSD software under the GPL. It does > > not prevent you from selling an OS that has both BSD and GPL bits, as > > long as the GPL bits come with full source. > If you have an executable object which includes GPL'd code, you must > supply FULL SOURCE for the *entire* object, not just the GPL'd bits. We're talking separate binaries here. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message