From owner-freebsd-new-bus Fri Aug 30 22:10:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-new-bus@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5C937B401 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail15.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F31E43E6A for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:10:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 13763 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2002 05:10:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail15.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2002 05:10:36 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (laptop.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.4]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7V5AZBQ050943; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 01:10:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020830.212744.52905008.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 01:10:37 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: bus_generic_probe() is wrong I think Cc: new-bus@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-new-bus@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 31-Aug-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > John Baldwin writes: >: Pretty much what I was saying. I have an atsys(4) driver btw that apm >: and nexus_pcib are now descendants of and only gets attached if the >: acpi identify fails in the jhb_acpipci p4 branch. > > hmmmm, I like this. maybe a pc98sys(4) driver might also not be a bad > idea. I'm not sure how pc98's nexus is related to i386's, but I know > that there's a lot of intertwingling there that aren't immeidately > apparent :-(. Looking at the files.pc98 list, it appears that it uses > the i386 nexus. > > Of course at this point apm(98) and the pci host bridge stuff likely > is the same between the two ports. So maybe atsys isn't quite the > right name. This is one thing that's common between the two ports, > even though a lot of the details of each of these beasts differ. Actually, a pc98sys(4) wouldn't be that hard to do, but most of those differences are in things like rman management that is still in the nexus after my atsys(4) changes. If we want to merge that with AT-sys for now, that's no big deal, though I would need a better name for it. > Warner -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-new-bus" in the body of the message