From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 3 16:34:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from waltz.rahul.net (waltz.rahul.net [192.160.13.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1748637B58E for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:34:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhesi@rahul.net) Received: from localhost.rahul.net (localhost.rahul.net [127.0.0.1]) by waltz.rahul.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C01E99E3F for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: do acregmin, acregmax, acdirmin, acdirmax work as documented Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:34:20 -0700 From: Rahul Dhesi Message-Id: <20000403233421.1C01E99E3F@waltz.rahul.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a filesystem NFS-exported by a FreeBSD 2.2.8 machine and NFS-mounted on a 3.4-STABLE machine with these attributes: rw,bg,nosuid,intr,acregmin=0,acregmax=0,acdirmin=0,acdirmax=0 According to the man page for nfs_mount, this would cause attributes for files and directories to be cached for 0 seconds, i.e., not cached at all. But the behavior I observe seems to indicate some amount of caching. Would some knowledgeable person confirm or deny that these options work as documented? Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message