From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 31 14:30:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D09D106564A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from andrej@antiszoc.hu)
Received: from mail.deployis.eu (mail.deployis.eu [217.20.135.253])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00568FC13
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antiszoc.hu;
	s=default; 
	h=Subject:To:From:Date; bh=1U6KCyeV3/1MmpIgxDHeDSEHtI2jGfOPhz3+ZzZQzRA=;
	b=nHrvQSVRrFZz/JYpanpP/8Ml5ZFLbJnnIQ+F6hmoyxcTzu0QlPgThH24oVHyYY1qmrkdef4eamRa0W6cWZHQG+5S0lMVf0Zcj+9j6aR58e8jGuYhAL1DAR+y/CrEqotV;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56230 helo=mail.deployis.eu)
	by mail.deployis.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian))
	id 1RKssH-0008IM-UL from <andrej@antiszoc.hu>
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:30:06 +0100
Received: from pool-232-195.ippark.hu ([31.223.232.195]) by mail.deployis.eu
	with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:30:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:30:05 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B3t_Andr=C3=A1s?= <andrej@antiszoc.hu>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EAE6538.4030001@my.gd>
References: <c677c67c90aed9e568895aaee0039732@antiszoc.hu>
	<4EAE6538.4030001@my.gd>
Message-ID: <a0179b06242cd2f88ac2218870126a35@antiszoc.hu>
X-Sender: andrej@antiszoc.hu
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2.1
X-DKIM-Status: None (from 127.0.0.1)
X-Mail-Status-postahivatal: trustedmail (from 127.0.0.1)
X-Spam-Score-postahivatal: -47
Subject: Re: pf rdr rule question - corrected
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:30:12 -0000

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:04 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 10/31/11 12:04 AM, Gót András wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port 
>> range:
>>
>> (pasv and past mistyping corrected)
>>
>> ---
>> ftp_pasv_start="X"
>> ftp_pasv_end="Y"
>>
>> rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from any to $internalip port
>> $ftp_pasv_start:$ftp_pasv_end -> $internalip
>>
>> pass in quick on $netif proto tcp from any to $internalip port
>> $ftp_pasv_start >< $ftp_pasv_end keep state flags S/SA
>>
>
> pass in quick on $netif proto tcp from any to $internalip port
> $ftp_pasv_start:$ftp_pasv_end
>
>
> Both keep state and flags S/SA are default, you don't need to write 
> them.

My problem is with the rdr rule, that the second macro won't get 
evaluated correctly. I just copied the stateful match rule, to make it 
more clear that with a pair of macros it's easier to set up.

FreeBSD version is 8.2.

Regards,
Andras