From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 14:38:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59E1065675; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C352C8FC1C; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA1EB970; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:38:14 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:06:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:38:14 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Yuri , hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:38:15 -0000 On Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:43:15 am Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 April 2012 15:29, Julian Elischer wrote: > > but we do add patches to make things work on FreeBSD. > > We add patches to make ports... > ... work on FreeBSD > ... conform to FreeBSD hier (to an extent) > ... work with alternate compilers, PREFIX, etc. > > We shouldn't add patches which "continue development". In all cases > the goal should be to upstream the patch ASAP. If there is no active > upstream and the patch does more than the above that is a sign that > someone needs to be willing to become the upstream maintainer first. In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. -- John Baldwin