Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:16:42 +0200 From: Fabien Costard <fabien.costard@free.fr> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" <freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default parameters for NanoBSD Message-ID: <6bf94b97-50a6-91ab-111e-dece2b22dfe4@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfp442ui2a7C8Do%2BLccShipE_FTObUb%2BZZ5_0rzO_48ppA@mail.gmail.com> References: <70eb2817-31d6-5671-11c2-dc2c4cc21850@free.fr> <CANCZdfp442ui2a7C8Do%2BLccShipE_FTObUb%2BZZ5_0rzO_48ppA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 10/09/2019 à 15:53, Warner Losh a écrit : > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:28 AM Fabien Costard <fabien.costard@free.fr > <mailto:fabien.costard@free.fr>> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > This is a question about the default values used for the nanobsd. > In the current default configuration (defaults.sh), the media size is > set to 2000000 (NANO_MEDIASIZE=2000000). > This size (1GB) does not allow to make an image when you follow the > documentation online. > > I know that the purpose of the nanobsd is to make "light" FreeBSD > system > but would it be better to change the default media size when someone > (like me) try to use and understand it step by step ? > > I found the media size have to be 9600000 (around 4.8GB) (to work > with 2 > images) > > What do you think about it ? > > > I built an image yesterday, and 1GB was still large enough. What arch > were you doing? What other things went onto the package? FreeBSD > itself, without compilers, should clock in around 300MB. > > I have no problem bumping the size. Today it's hard to buy something > smaller than 16GB (though there's a lot of lots of 4GB and 8GB on > amazon, the sweet spot for price has moved to 32GB). It's likely time. > I like to keep it small because the images are copied around and that > takes up space. > > Warner What I just mean is if you just use the nanobsd.sh script without touching anything it fails with the message: "/usr/obj/nanobsd.full/_.mnt: write failed, filesystem is full". But I totally agree about the size and my next step is to work on that optimization :-) Fabien
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6bf94b97-50a6-91ab-111e-dece2b22dfe4>