From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 19:22:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987A51065677 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EF48FC2C for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:22:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7MJMdn2078597; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:22:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7MJMcUN091064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:22:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200808221922.m7MJMcUN091064@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:22:41 -0400 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20080822191146.T66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200808221719.m7MHJY25090566@lava.sentex.ca> <20080822191146.T66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange TCP issue on RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:22:42 -0000 At 03:12 PM 8/22/2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >can you make sure you have this? > >http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/181596 Hi, I do. I am running a GENERIC kernel but with inet6 disabled from yesterday 7.0-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 21 10:27:04 EDT 2008 and with the patch below as TOE seems to be broken for my workload # diff -u sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.disable --- sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c 2008-08-01 13:47:27.000000000 -0400 +++ sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.disable 2008-08-22 15:16:50.000000000 -0400 @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct rtentry *rt; int error; + return (EINVAL); + /* * Look up the route used for the connection to * determine if it uses an interface capable of I can try changing to ipfw and see if that makes a difference ? But the RST doesnt sound like a pf issue no ? I would have thought it would just blackhole the packet. ---Mike