From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 28 23:26:20 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id XAA10444 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:26:20 -0800 Received: from wcarchive.cdrom.com (wcarchive.cdrom.com [192.216.191.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA10434 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:26:18 -0800 Received: from orion.stars.sed.monmouth.army.mil ([158.9.11.65]) by wcarchive.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA22206 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 05:43:29 -0800 Message-Id: <199502281343.FAA22206@wcarchive.cdrom.com> Received: by orion.stars.sed.monmouth.army.mil (1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA203769006; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 08:43:26 -0500 From: william pechter ILEX Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD To: FreeBSD-hackers@wcarchive.cdrom.com (FreeBSD-hackers) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 08:43:26 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 858 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In reply to Julian Elischer who said > > > > > > > > > Just to re-iterate, my suggestion is to (a) make ld.so compatible and > > > > > > > > This suggest that we have a /usr/shlib/NetBSD > > which would be good because it would fit in with the > > /usr/shlib/iBSC2-SCO > > and > > /usr/shlib/Linux > > that are already coming down the pipeline. > > we could then have: > > /usr/shlib/FreeBSD-1 for the compat stuff. > > > > I like this plan. > Boy would this be nice. Shared libraries to run Linux stuff and NetBSD stuff. This is a great idea -- but how doable is it? Bill ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Pechter |Systems Administrator | Ilex Systems |170 Patterson Ave | Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702 908-532-2943 |pechter@sesd.ilex.com | pechter@stars.sed.monmouth.army.mil