From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 12:25:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894E1065672 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 12:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31978FC20 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 12:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-255-48-78.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.48.78]:52211 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M8vTa-0001SD-9T for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:09:52 +0200 Received: (qmail 26061 invoked from network); 26 May 2009 14:09:48 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 26 May 2009 14:09:48 +0200 Received: (qmail 14145 invoked by uid 1001); 26 May 2009 14:09:48 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:09:48 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Randy Bush Message-ID: <20090526120948.GA14134@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20090526113714.GC1043@straylight.m.ringlet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.48.78 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1M8vTa-0001SD-9T. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1M8vTa-0001SD-9T beacff14380b39996ab97ccd5ed78491 Cc: Peter Pentchev , ports Subject: Re: make.conf no x option X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:25:40 -0000 On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever > >> option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of > >> it's 500kg friends. but i can not seem to find it. > > I think you're looking for WITHOUT_X11=yes :) > > i have that. i still get a lot of x with some ports. i will try to > keep a watch for which ones. Well, there are many ports which depend unconditionally upon X. If you install one of them (or some other port which depends on one of them) you will get X, no questions asked. WITHOUT_X11 is useful for those ports which have an optional dependency upon X, but that is all it does. There does not exist any flag which tells the ports-system to refuse to build any ports which depend on X, which seems to be what you want. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se