From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:57:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6967F1065670 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuck@thesouthernlibertarian.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0E58FC17 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so796038ywt.13 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.191.73 with SMTP id f49mr26168886yhn.50.1320759151617; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:32:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from funbeast.localnet (c-98-230-65-110.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [98.230.65.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q57sm2179492yhi.22.2011.11.08.05.32.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:32:30 -0800 (PST) From: Chuck Burns To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:31:49 -0600 Message-ID: <30719078.XD2KNDdpQA@funbeast> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.1.0-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4EB92ADA.6080309@daemonic.se> References: <4EB9142D.3090705@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EB92ADA.6080309@daemonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:10:57 +0000 Subject: Re: /sys/amd64/conf/DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:57:11 -0000 On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 02:12:58 PM Niclas Zeising wrote: > From my understanding of things, the DEFAULTS kernel configuration file > is automatically included into the build by config(8). There is no need > to include it into the generic using the "include" statement. It was > first added 6 years ago, on October 27 2005. > Regards! Not sure if you already know this, or not but another thing to keep in mind, if a module is not mentioned, or is commented out, then it will still be built, just not included into the monolithic kernel. If you were already aware of this, then my apologies. Chuck