From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 23:18:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403CB16A420 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:18:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C663F43D45 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:18:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 53196 invoked by uid 399); 30 Oct 2005 23:18:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Oct 2005 23:18:20 -0000 Message-ID: <436554BA.5030806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:18:18 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <200510271734.j9RHYZAk015054@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051030062148.GA76667@dragon.NUXI.org> <4364D017.1050605@samsco.org> <20051030231108.GQ1327@elvis.mu.org> <43655427.9060804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43655427.9060804@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Long , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , Maxime Henrion , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf DEFAULTS GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:18:23 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Maxime Henrion wrote: > > >>While I'm all for making FreeBSD less prone to errors like the one >>discussed here, I feel that having: a DEFAULTS file, a good comment >>explaining what purpose it serves in it, an explicit include DEFAULTS in >>GENERIC and a big scary comment next to it inclde explaining why one >>should not remove it ought to be sufficient. > > > I think you're right, at around the 6.2-RELEASE mark or so. I think that our > developers tend to dramatically overestimate s/over/under/. This post used to be longer, but I condensed out the bit that would have allowed that sentence to make sense. :) > the amount of stuff that the > average user needs to keep track of, especially when we're talking one or > two major revision bumps. > > Doug > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection