From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 11:45:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0152E22D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x230.google.com (ia-in-x0230.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FDA9FC for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so1270375iac.35 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:45:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=PV3w5lfZHjcq+LUN0MDofPJ2mb6wTqZ1aDQib51bHV0=; b=nhKnEnMA7CyqyQHfAcOMXxADPipEUml8scAmivXgUoJlw+pa69IcEu7WBDwTVstdTE a2pQCAubFeOCQ6H1nyquBgLTNeY8qHdNBfFbc1/dAs3NN7zDoXLEJA1QFwpOIHk6Kw8R OTE+5qxeLCYEWFqw3h9cWxYXyQUqDkhjVWnoF7E+n3iHJVI9W145TuLIhj//ZrCT+17D 7rCbZTwM5WdmYV6REQm74XlVRVXxlK1ie0xUVBJ6VB6/vj1y4KDEP/Yk9AQZNXRlTGWT BKtbqzoQvownT/P4o7Xvkd2zUI51LGm120SjJt6eLdHrJOXt3jSUtg1D/MUd3Bvhzc8y tbhQ== X-Received: by 10.50.42.165 with SMTP id p5mr748816igl.75.1361619922356; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:45:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:44:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130223111646.GI1672@netinertia.co.uk> References: <201302212011.r1LKBJRD020916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20130223111646.GI1672@netinertia.co.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:44:52 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NzbMMlz6hfyTqhhATWuEjuu-ysE Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports/176334: Fix port: sysutils/boxbackup rc script and OPTIONSng To: "James O'Gorman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:45:24 -0000 On 23 February 2013 11:16, James O'Gorman wrote: > The patch looks fine to me in general. Only thing I noticed is that with > the pkg-message the notice about the config files moving seems to have > been dropped from the client component. > > If the patch is updated for this I'll be happy for it to be commented. Ah-- from my reading of the current pkg-message.client the config files movement isn't mentioned? Is it the client or the server that uses the config files? Chris