From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 26 22:42:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA18899 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 22:42:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA18894 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 22:42:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id GAA24420; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 06:06:13 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199804270406.GAA24420@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: CBQ, was: Bandwidth throttling etc. To: fritchie@MR.Net (Scott Lystig Fritchie) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 06:06:12 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199804270526.AAA01649@data.mr.net> from "Scott Lystig Fritchie" at Apr 27, 98 00:26:17 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > After reading two freebsd-current-digest's full of "Bandwidth > throttling etc." discussion, I had to chime in with an additional > reference which may or may not be of any assistance to Luigi and > others discussing the matter. See: > > http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/floyd/cbq.html thanks, although both I and eskecially Kenjiro have read it. The discussion (in my view at least) was more towards finding a nice and effective way to integrate the new code into the ipfw interface, rather than solve theoretical problems. cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message