From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 18 17:49:13 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6BC8F37B401; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snark.ratmir.ru (snark.ratmir.ru [213.24.248.177])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EB0DA43FB1; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from alexs@snark.ratmir.ru)
Received: from snark.ratmir.ru (alexs@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snark.ratmir.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3J0nAC2067873;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 04:49:10 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from alexs@snark.ratmir.ru)
Received: (from alexs@localhost)
	by snark.ratmir.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3J0nA0G067872;
	Sat, 19 Apr 2003 04:49:10 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 04:49:10 +0400
From: Alex Semenyaka <alexs@ratmir.ru>
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <20030419004910.GG3693@snark.ratmir.ru>
References: <20030418224522.GA63339@snark.ratmir.ru>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10304181851120.5006-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
	<20030418230818.GE3693@snark.ratmir.ru>
	<20030418233414.GF3693@snark.ratmir.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030418233414.GF3693@snark.ratmir.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Alex Semenyaka <alexs@ratmir.ru>
cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libpthread patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:49:13 -0000

On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 03:34:14AM +0400, Alex Semenyaka wrote:
> By the way... I just thought that it might be reasonable to allow user to
> choose that behaviour on the fly (like he can do it for the malloc(3)).

Sorry for such amount of messages. This is the last one in this bunch.
I found myself software that ignores SIGCHLD with signal(3) but wants then
to wait() for a child.

So, I must say: this behaviour might be done as an option, if user wants it,
and sould be prohibited by default. So do anybody have objections against
the patch which will allow such optional behaviour if some envvariable is
set?

> Thanks again :)

And again, and sorry :)

								SY, Alex