From owner-cvs-src-old@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 16:52:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src-old@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFACA1065674 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEDF8FC17 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0PGqp1X047485 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:51 GMT (envelope-from ed@repoman.freebsd.org) Received: (from svn2cvs@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0PGqpqY047484 for cvs-src-old@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:51 GMT (envelope-from ed@repoman.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <200901251652.n0PGqpqY047484@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: svn2cvs set sender to ed@repoman.freebsd.org using -f From: Ed Schouten Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:41 +0000 (UTC) To: cvs-src-old@freebsd.org X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/pf/net pf_ioctl.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src-old@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:52 -0000 ed 2009-01-25 16:52:41 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/contrib/pf/net pf_ioctl.c Log: SVN rev 187689 on 2009-01-25 16:52:41Z by ed Revert my previous two changes. Even though the code seems to be FreeBSD kernel code, it isn't compiled on FreeBSD. I could have known this, because I was a little amazed that I couldn't find a prototype of pfopen()/pfclose() somewhere else, because it isn't marked as static. Apart from that, removing these functions wouldn't have been harmful anyway, because there are some other strange things about them (the implementation isn't consistent with the prototype at the top). Still, it's better to leave it, because it makes merging code back to older branches a little harder. Requested by: mlaier Revision Changes Path 1.41 +16 -0 src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c