Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:02:08 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file systems Message-ID: <20140327120208.522373e0@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20140327010850.GA33907@neutralgood.org> References: <CANMDHqeqQwuub4CeQKhEGss2Z%2BACzwrsiyMDG3c7mfPunwrpNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHHBGko4p_Lgrcb4_NmRJUfStfKnPudohZWVMSGfMAYMibMgHg@mail.gmail.com> <20140327010850.GA33907@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:08:50 -0400 kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:07:31PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > You're talking about a single filesystem of 16TB? Well, depending > > on how you plan to use it, that might work. It will probably take > > several GB of memory to fsck such a monster. > > Background fsck with SU+J may be an option. Background fsck and SU+J are alternatives. > Foreground fsck will > indeed take quite a while. Personally, I don't have a good feeling > about using background fsck. SU+J has a worse reputation. UFS2 with gjournal would avoid the fsck problem if for some reason the OP doesn't want to go with ZFS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140327120208.522373e0>