From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:37:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2988016A4CE; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:37:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [213.90.36.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C46443D69; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:36:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from josef@daemon.li) Received: from pam.utanet.at ([213.90.36.6]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agpst-0000PM-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:36:55 +0100 Received: from dsl-244-254.utaonline.at ([212.152.244.254] helo=jenny.daemon.li) by pam.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agpss-0002Nm-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:36:54 +0100 Received: by jenny.daemon.li (Postfix, from userid 1005) id D4DBB10FF; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:37:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:37:10 +0100 From: Josef El-Rayes To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20040114183710.GA463@jenny.daemon.li> References: <4004D445.7020205@acm.org> <20040114180647.GA682@arthur.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114180647.GA682@arthur.nitro.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Reply-Path: josef@daemon.li X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org cc: Tim Kientzle Subject: Re: Request for Comments: libarchive, bsdtar X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: josef@daemon.li List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:37:00 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: > > Before I invest more > > of my scarce time on refining bsdtar, I'd like to know whether > > there is real interest in replacing gnutar with bsdtar. > >=20 > > Feedback and comments greatly appreciated, >=20 > While I have no cruse against GNU tools, I think it would really nice to > replace GNU tar with a BSD licensed one. i also think it is good to replace gnu tools with bsd equivalents. -josef --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUBQAWMVlnFItmnnbU8AQJc3ggAqlBSnbvAzy58F1R7jquRvP/JeYLFDhO5 uMYeycYJoAiGcoVV3QgDdBFisD/BUkvUwKKyBjxKLePbX1rx0L9L7LMTLUY9lQqx yAaQaskkNsyT2uNlUTNoIkAgnFGd3/S2uieohgyhF+bLsWyejHg11y7B9bCf9IW6 fjprtk87P0ubxfcOj5NS2J/QQvt4c2j5IApSaTerj8539hWXPpOmgYpb1VhcNWc9 omK5e/MKsIeV7r3HJZPb8dTObEZjzO+PyBibjd9PET61qA0N9+mRGUEIHLtv3Ld0 OnR/HSIVjzxfXjmJF6yVTuR+/Q50GFj64vHFSEWx7QVbelGkpxJbXw== =V75s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--