From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 02:51:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251431065675 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4D48FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7548 invoked by uid 399); 1 Jun 2010 02:51:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 1 Jun 2010 02:51:08 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C04759B.4080306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:51:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lawrence Stewart References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <4C04456D.7080408@jrv.org> <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kostik Belousov , Roman Divacky , "James R. Van Artsdalen" , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:51:10 -0000 On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > [snip interesting history] > >> I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows >> the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. > > Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this > footnote in James' email. It sounds like a sensible and useful > suggestion that would go some way to addressing Kostik's concerns about > knowing whether a kernel bug report was related to a gcc or clang built > kernel. +1 -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/