Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:51:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "James R. Van Artsdalen" <james-freebsd-current@jrv.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <4C04759B.4080306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <4C04456D.7080408@jrv.org> <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > [snip interesting history] > >> I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows >> the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. > > Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this > footnote in James' email. It sounds like a sensible and useful > suggestion that would go some way to addressing Kostik's concerns about > knowing whether a kernel bug report was related to a gcc or clang built > kernel. +1 -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C04759B.4080306>