From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 4 14:50:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA12035 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:50:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA12029 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca1-139.ix.netcom.com [209.109.232.139]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA12468; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id OAA23083; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199809042148.OAA23083@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: obrien@NUXI.com CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19980903122855.A28340@nuxi.com> (obrien@NUXI.com) Subject: Re: mkhybrid From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * I'd like to nuke the mkhybrid11 and mkhybrid12 ports, and resurect * mkhybrid. mkisofs tracks the current release, not the beta, why should * this be any different? Talk to the maintainer and dburr first. If they say ok, that's fine for me. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message