Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:35:26 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r332489 - in head: gnu/usr.bin/gdb/kgdb sys/conf sys/dev/dcons sys/dev/hyperv/vmbus/i386 sys/dev/ppc sys/dev/syscons sys/i386/conf sys/i386/i386 sys/i386/include sys/i386/include/pc sys...
Message-ID:  <20180423233526.2eb5aaab@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180422205103.GX6887@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <201804132030.w3DKUnFn050153@repo.freebsd.org> <20180422210656.29cb7d0a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20180422192614.GW6887@kib.kiev.ua> <20180422205103.GX6887@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 23:51:03 +0300 Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:26:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:06:56PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:  
>>> Could this have broken the linux futex syscall?  I have a linux program
>>> that gets stuck in linux_sys_futex and becomes unkillable.  Note that the
>>> routines in sys/i386/linux/linux_support.s try to do atomic operations on
>>> user space addresses.  
>> 
>> Yes, it is quite possible.  I will try to look next week.  
> 
> Try this.  I only compile-tested it as a module.

Yes, this fixes it.  That was quick, thanks!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180423233526.2eb5aaab>