From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Feb 16 8:45: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37E537B401 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA02878; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:39 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda02874; Fri Feb 16 08:44:37 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f1GGiWp74105; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdN74099; Fri Feb 16 08:44:19 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f1GGiJR29010; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200102161644.f1GGiJR29010@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdE29002; Fri Feb 16 08:44:16 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Mark Murray , Matt Dillon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:26:18 CST." <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:15 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writ es: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:30:27AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Gro > up wrote: > > Other candidates, Kerveros IV. Anyone is serious about using Kerberos > > would install the krb5 port. (I don't consider heimdal a serious > > condender, it's already a port and it should have stayed there). IMO, > > both Kerberos IV and heimdal are just a waste of disk space). > > Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on your comments about Heimdal. > There is a lot to like about it over the MIT Kerberos implementation, > not the least of which is the fact that the MIT Kerberos license still > does not allow export from US. I understand it to be not a full implementation of Kerberos V. There was some discussion about this on -stable or -security some time ago. As you're the maintainer of both in the FreeBSD ports/source trees you would know more about that than I do. Maybe I'm off base here. -- Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message