From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 27 07:22:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA07426 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 07:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (root@buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA07416 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 07:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA25254 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 09:24:06 GMT Received: from buffnet7.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa16569; 27 Aug 96 10:29 EDT Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:28:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Stephen Hovey To: Richard Wackerbarth cc: Steve Hovey , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird named problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 27 Aug 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > >None of the named's on any of my bsd's (2.05, 2.1r and 2.1.5r) can > >resolve www.riddler.com, but my sco's can - an ideas? > > Perhaps it is because there are errors in the nameserver setup. > The root nameservers do not seem to delegate riddler.com. > > Are your sco's somehow "related" to that domain? Eg, are they a secondary DNS? > No - and it gets freakier - my linux (the 2.something - its the latest pre3.0) cant resolve it either. But suddenly my 2.1R's can by the second attempt after stopping and starting named. But the 2.0.5 just wont.