From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 18 11: 2:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fedde.littleton.co.us (cfedde.dsl.frii.net [216.17.139.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEF137B404 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:02:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedde.littleton.co.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fedde.littleton.co.us (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g0IJ2R898818; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:02:27 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200201181902.g0IJ2R898818@fedde.littleton.co.us> To: "Joe & Fhe Barbish" Cc: "FBSD Questions" Subject: Re: ifconfig Nic card default mode? In-Reply-To: From: Chris Fedde Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:02:27 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:04:22 -0500 "Joe & Fhe Barbish" wrote: +------------------ | The second sentence in the original post answers your question. | | "That means the server Nic card is receiving | much much faster that it is sending out." | | What is so hard about understanding that? +------------------ My question has to do with how the test was conducted. If these are numbers collected in a single test then the answer is obvious. If they represent two different transfers one in each direction then there is something else going on and more information is needed to isolate the failure. If you provide enough information to duplicate your test I could help a bit better. Usually this involves cutting and pasting a few command lines and their results. I know that I sound like a crumudgen. But please understand that I'm really trying to help. The more complete the info you can provide the more likely that we can isolate the problem. Thanks -- Chris Fedde To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message