From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 20 07:08:42 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA22481
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA22476
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA04952; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id HAA00180; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 -0800
Message-Id: <199512201508.HAA00180@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf.c and USL copyright at top 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 95 06:42:21 PST."
             <1140.819470541@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 -0800
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>OK, so it was a mistake to add code to encumbered files.  No argument
>from anybody on that point, I'm pretty sure.  However, do we just
>throw up our hands in defeat?  I surely hope not!  Your analysis below
>would certainly suggest to me that removing the USL copyright is now
>an option we can realistically entertain.  It's not even remotely
>"derived" from now.  In our CVS tree, we're no worse off than before.
>In our exported tree, it's one less encumbered file, right?

   conf.c will be going away in the near future, anyway, so why is this an
issue?

-DG