Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf.c and USL copyright at top Message-ID: <199512201508.HAA00180@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 95 06:42:21 PST." <1140.819470541@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>OK, so it was a mistake to add code to encumbered files. No argument >from anybody on that point, I'm pretty sure. However, do we just >throw up our hands in defeat? I surely hope not! Your analysis below >would certainly suggest to me that removing the USL copyright is now >an option we can realistically entertain. It's not even remotely >"derived" from now. In our CVS tree, we're no worse off than before. >In our exported tree, it's one less encumbered file, right? conf.c will be going away in the near future, anyway, so why is this an issue? -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512201508.HAA00180>