From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 2 15:31:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D2A2C3 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) Received: from smtp21.services.sfr.fr (smtp21.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4481834 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [84.102.168.164]) by msfrf2107.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EABD67000067 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:31:16 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr Received: from X1 (164.168.102.84.rev.sfr.net [84.102.168.164]) by msfrf2107.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 9535C70000B2 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:31:16 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20150602153116611.9535C70000B2@msfrf2107.sfr.fr Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:31:15 +0200 From: francesco scaglione To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading libvpx demands bash Message-Id: <20150602173115.d3b132732fa17f42e97538e7@neuf.fr> In-Reply-To: <556DB137.3090007@freebsd.org> References: <20150602121740.f2af02dcd9be77d4ac18ab41@neuf.fr> <20150602133523.c14287e0faa0884da67f26ef@neuf.fr> <556DB137.3090007@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:31:25 -0000 --- On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:35:51 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 06/02/15 14:03, jungle Boogie wrote: > > On 2 June 2015 at 05:58, Alexandre Labarre > > wrote: > >> > Packages are built once per week for the moment (every Wednesday > >> > if I remember well). > > > > I've always heard the one per week. Do you know if that's only if > > the port changes or does it build regardless of any update? > > Packages are being built several times a week now. There should be > updates something like 3 times a week, although that may be modified > if there is some bad security hole or other problem having > significant impact. > > Cheers, > > Matthew I had never thought that packages were a better option for tiny machines like mines. But that could really be the case, since I always fear the moment my Intel Atom has to update big ports like gcc, which is required by... # pkg info -r gcc gcc-4.8.4_3: libvpx-1.3.0 ouch, libvpx again! So, with packages, no more gcc nor bash, is that right? Thanks for the tip, Francesco