Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:51:40 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING Message-ID: <20030728215140.GE29339@spc.org> In-Reply-To: <200307282151.h6SLpSoZ025344@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <200307282345.28228.vjardin@wanadoo.fr> <200307282151.h6SLpSoZ025344@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > RTF_XRESOLVE is set when the target of the newly cloned route is not > known by the kernel and must be set up by a user process. I'm not > sure if anything ever used this, although I guess it could be used to > implement ISIS. I have a hack in the works to support on-demand routing in a userland daemon which will actually make use of this. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030728215140.GE29339>