From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 12 18:26:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C55216A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:26:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1734B43D39 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-246-51.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.246.51]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9CIQk7n045336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <416C21CC.1060305@mac.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:26:20 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <200410121232.i9CCWhdF078322@shark.rtp.freebsd.org> <012201c4b059$d2e97670$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <012201c4b059$d2e97670$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pi.codefab.com cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:26:51 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > Please tell me we aren't going to get one of these every hour till they > are fix :P I'd hate to disagree with you when you're right. For that matter, I'd hate to disagree with someone else if they were right, too. :-) Could someone change the nag script to send to ports-committers, instead? Or run less often via cron (once per day)? Or run more often but more usefully, by going in as a CVS-commit time check rather than afterwards? -- -Chuck