From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 28 15:22:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from webpimps.net (lgb-DSL71-cust207.mpowercom.net [208.57.71.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68FC37B40C for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorldClient [127.0.0.1] by webpimps.net [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.1.2.R) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:20:32 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:20:32 -0700 From: "Aaron" To: "Garrett Rooney" Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Darwin and FreeBSD on PPC X-Mailer: WorldClient Standard 3.1.2 In-Reply-To: <20010928173241.A27363@electricjellyfish.net> X-MDRcpt-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: click46@webpimps.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20010928222247.D68FC37B40C@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thats what I was afraid of. I wondered where Mach came into play; now I know. I would really like to see FreeBSD on the PowerPC arch. In the long term scheme of things, I plan to try and learn PPC assembly [currently taking an intro x86 asm class] for this purpose. thanks for the reply, - aaron --------------------------------------------- click46[wp] - AIM the click46 - ICQ 43450396 webpimps.net | bsdatwork.com | nerdserve.net moderator - o/c cooling forum @ hardforum.com -----Original Message----- From: Garrett Rooney To: Aaron Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:32:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Darwin and FreeBSD on PPC > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:25:41PM -0700, Aaron wrote: > > My apologies if this has been brought up before [I could not find any > > mention of it] > > > > Since Darwin/OS X runs on the PowerPC arch, and its mostly based on > > FreeBSD; then why can't most of the code be ported back to FreeBSD to > > speed up the PPC port? Is it Apple's license or the fact that Darwin > has > > changed the FreeBSD kernel so drastically; or is my logic fatally > flawed? > > Darwin isn't really based on the FreeBSD kernel. It uses parts of > FreeBSD's userland and libraries, and some portions of the kernel > originated in FreeBSD (for example their /dev/random is a port of the > FreeBSD /dev/random), but their kernel is derived from NextStep, and > has significant differences from FreeBSD's kernel in many ways. > > -garrett > > -- > garrett rooney Unix was not designed to stop you > from > rooneg@electricjellyfish.net doing stupid things, because that > would > http://electricjellyfish.net/ stop you from doing clever things. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message