From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 31 01:03:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E831065679; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E188FC17; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lstewart-laptop.caia.swin.edu.au (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lauren.room52.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9V12u3M062828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:02:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4AEB8CBC.5050705@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:02:52 -0700 From: Lawrence Stewart User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on lauren.room52.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, benjsc@freebsd.org, sam@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org Subject: WPI panic (was: Can we turn off WPI_DEBUG) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:03:06 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into > sys/dev/wpi. > > Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates > a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg > every day and haven't had any problems with it for ages so I think > it's safe to say we're out of the period were debug by default is needed? Doug, have you ever experienced the issue with your 3945 card that I reported here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-October/023348.html I'm guessing you haven't by your comment about lack of problems. Do you run with INVARIANTS in your kernel? Cheers, Lawrence