From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 23:26:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles361.castles.com [208.214.167.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259BA14FD9 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:26:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06192; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:20:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903140720.XAA06192@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Rahul Dhesi Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 PST." <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:20:43 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just my opinion: The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so > reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree > of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6 > months. > > Since there have already been two releases (3.0 and 3.1) which served as > test releases, the time is now ripe for one matching the description > above. That sounds like a wonderful idea. Are you volunteering the labour to help achieve this goal? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message