Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:15:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: brian@awfulhak.org Subject: Re: TEST/REVIEW ng_ether/ng_pppoe/ppp Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0402160605210.4375@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <402FEC68.30700@elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0402151300260.4375@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <402FEC68.30700@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi,
first thanks for your feedback.
> this comment and the code disagree....
> + /* If "promisc" hook not connected, let packet continue */
> + if (priv->lower == NULL || priv->lowerType!=LOWER_TYPE_PROMISC) {
> + m_freem(m);
> + return;
> + }
>
>
> if not connected.. discarded....
I will update this and also change the comment for the orphan hook.
> In the documentation:
> +written to the hook. The interface has to be put into promiscuous before
> +by using p.ex.
> +.Dv NGM_ETHER_SET_PROMISC .
> +Normal incoming traffic is unaffected.
>
> what is the "p.ex" ?
I should have written e.g. or even better for example.
p.ex. is per exemplum (latin).
> you should make an attempt to contact brian
will do so. aah he's on Cc: already.
Thanks again.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0402160605210.4375>