Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 22:42:31 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <xzpsmrrerig.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030506195151.GA60115@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey A. Chernov's message of "Tue, 6 May 2003 23:51:51 %2B0400") References: <20030505205051.GA40572@nagual.pp.ru> <20030505231135.GA21953@madman.celabo.org> <20030505231837.GA44533@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpy91k3j9n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030506170823.GI83663@lucky.net> <xzpllxkez78.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030506182756.GA57720@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp8ytjgbq4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030506190747.GA59160@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp1xzbg8zc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030506195151.GA60115@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > It is incomplete in the same way as Jacques one since we both discuss only > functions so far. The difference is that my approach move us towards > standards conformance while Jacques one to opposite direction. You're the one advocating breaking the linker. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsmrrerig.fsf>