From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 22:50:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390BA106566C for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6358FC0C for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntcmgw09p ([61.9.169.169]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120503225027.GVYQ24575.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw09p>; Thu, 3 May 2012 22:50:27 +0000 Received: from johnny.reilly.home ([124.188.162.192]) by nskntcmgw09p with BigPond Outbound id 5aqS1j00G49NTNc01aqSTB; Thu, 03 May 2012 22:50:27 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Lam+G0ji c=1 sm=1 a=E3UA96qjU4/DKYBP5EH6OA==:17 a=z1TLwsU0kBEA:10 a=zX61To6fwxcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fymICWX_wfrnZ7_I4q8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=E3UA96qjU4/DKYBP5EH6OA==:117 Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:50:26 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: George Kontostanos Message-ID: <20120503225026.GA26284@johnny.reilly.home> References: <20120502063927.GA9559@johnny.reilly.home> <4FA0D844.8090105@brockmann-consult.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpart labels - why arent't some showing up in /dev/gpt/? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:50:34 -0000 On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:11:41PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote: > You can always use: gpart show -l > > That should display the label. Or gpart list, for more verbose output. Neither of those helps with commands that require arguments that are device names under /dev, though (such as mount or zpool create), which I where my problem lies. Perhaps I explained it poorly, sorry. Cheers, -- Andrew