Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:24:58 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: treating OPTIONS Message-ID: <4066C41A.90504@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040328112228.GA593@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> References: <20040327200136.31711.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <1080436501.75008.5.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20040328112228.GA593@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > [...] > > Autodetection is not bad as such, but it needs to be overridable and it > should not be allowed to mess with OPTIONS. I agree that there should be a way to turn it off, but why should the port not preselect OPTIONS that activate features that are available on the current system? I your case you would get LDAP support preselected, but could simply turn it off? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4066C41A.90504>