Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:40:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277332] dns/knot-resolver and dns/knot3 are mutually exclusive due to dns/knot3-lib Message-ID: <bug-277332-7788-76sNeAvjp6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-277332-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-277332-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277332 --- Comment #11 from Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> --- Created attachment 252364 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D252364&action= =3Dedit knot with all options (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #10) > simply make knot3 which includes BOTH server && client providing options = to install either, or both. Isn't that a simpler and a more elegant alterna= tive? :) It's lib (always) + deamon (optional/default) + utils (optional/default). So your suggestion was basically the approach I was aiming for, unaware that generating enable/disable and with/without configure options has improved s= ince last time I tried the same (long ago). While at it, I even made each module optional. IMHO that's great, but not perfect(yet), minor "problem" is that paradoxal selections seem possible. So not fully foolproof, but looks like able to se= rve every user-demand. And making knot3-lib absolete. Please have a look at this patch, and let me know what you think. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277332-7788-76sNeAvjp6>