Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:28:12 +0900 From: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> To: ade@lovett.com, jedgar@fxp.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE + Qt libraries + gcc 2.95 Message-ID: <19991110012812M.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <19991108140753.B83804@lovett.com> References: <XFMail.991108143550.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911081445190.92998-100000@pawn.primelocation.net> <19991108140753.B83804@lovett.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 02:49:27PM -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > > > > My biggest concern will be the library incompatibility with kde libs > > compiled with an older g++. Perhaps a version bump may alleviate > > problems; otherwise, I don't expect the general populice will be too happy > > with having to recomple *all* kde libs/apps. > > A version bump (in conjunction with setting USE_NEWGCC=YES) for all > the KDE/Qt ports seems to be the best way to go in order to ensure > consistency. > > Whilst it doesn't address the fact that people will have to do a fair > chunk of recompiling, at least it will be obvious that they have to do so. Yes, it will be a quite huge labor. Some port depending on qt may need many patches for gcc-2.95, so I don't think it has a reality. There is NEW_GCCed qt-i18n, so I think you can use it. I have the port of kdevelop-1.0 beta4 for qt-i18n, and it was not the difficult work. :) (But it is not well tested yet) http://www.kde.gr.jp/~imura/kdevelop-1.0b4-port.tar.gz --- R. Imura To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991110012812M.imura>