Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:02:28 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net> To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: proposed change to ld.so Message-ID: <199504190402.WAA01767@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <9504190445.AA17309@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> References: <199504190329.VAA01681@trout.sri.MT.net> <9504190445.AA17309@cabri.obs-besancon.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Cascade changes to ld.so ] > "critical" may be exagerated, but this is the only way to get nTk > working. (nTk is a perl interface to Tk 4.0) Forgive my ignorance, but wouldn't it be better to use TkPerl with Perl 5.0, since that appears to be used and supported? Then again, it may suffer the same symptoms. (I ask because I'm interested in building GUI Perl apps, and Perl5 w/TkPerl seems to offer the best merge of new technology with a supported product. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504190402.WAA01767>