From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 00:43:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D969A99BF for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6E71D5D; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897721632; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:43:43 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Brandon Allbery Cc: Mark Linimon , Michelle Sullivan , freebsd-stable , Jason Unovitch , herbert@oslo.ath.cx Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? Message-ID: <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1rguoi8KZGYj2k4L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:43:46 -0000 --1rguoi8KZGYj2k4L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon wrot= e: >=20 > > zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well > > as amd64. > > >=20 > Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a > 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days before > the kernel panics started. >=20 Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. Glen --1rguoi8KZGYj2k4L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVsYo/AAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTHbcQAKPTvJD0z5YflC9MzPKRFc7o F33oD6Eq0+xZuo5Lx0+MxefjwsP4B3rAuP+iHYgN3kCxFiDdk+5QBkEal4m0FAkm I+ID5ViiZamfE6Omr2eXSKd2KGVlmaTaxQ7zEocD3jFCv88cA3n6KQ2CBXptCyhd yQNgb7EAwu58F3GFwPn/qsiSLQt+3HPd3Ryn1SlYYLlvI5mf37TuX4UnKu45JcsI QXz+5c55hvGFWV6UcDfhWV6WU/ChckYoheZyZLVNRX3p9mM0u8WxSTQluGMV4Noc ls1q3tlfX4BqcHJJsv9yOSaO9+epyNee3U7hGi6BqNSexEJZte9w5J9NqXktGw6S ActpsGfCgKhd+GzKZDBRJxP1t2CfqYc0Fp2RyXcw6VtIoXOp7+TedTineAuChnL0 akwhjDoHQ8lSoDI8K2Ujge6E0S/670e83G/dv7WpoNpvj2V2jQUH2RtyRnu45U/w TJEz6ACvWbAw9jn1fC0NQNavsQV87T4TOHWgHHm7vN7MKHbEgo5caSQOc8R7nXlu 3m4RxEf5JZIDwAW2eLO8iBnUCD7UHZEhZ/Pq5qpkshGBrbFqNN7iGiC6Ltxx37Hl juzdToCtvGl4wG4BzcgQ47pN9kUlePCgNax7yX+uBJMrI/1SORpWICJL27mmzVXI X2KHb/7LT6hEVjjGl5xD =FT1F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1rguoi8KZGYj2k4L--