From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jul  3 16:41:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA08788
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ref.tfs.com ([206.245.251.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA08781
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA03550; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607032339.QAA03550@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: New (BIOS) bootblock ?feature?
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "JULIAN Elischer" <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607032226.PAA11550@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jul 3, 96 03:26:57 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > 
> > > How does this interact with erich@uruk.org's "multiboot" proposed
> > > standard and code?
> > 
> > can you give me a pointer?
> 
> http://www.uruk.org/grub/boot-proposal.html
> 
> He recently released code in several news groups... he's the Intel
> employee working with the SMP project.

I looked at his stuff.
I don't think it's really relevant to these changes....

julian