From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 17 1: 3:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from atkielski.com (atkielski.com [161.58.232.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D4037B405 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 01:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from contactdish (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by atkielski.com (8.11.6) id fAH92pt44397; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:02:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <023701c16f46$a34cfc90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "Steve Tremblett" Cc: "Jon Molin" , References: <000e01c16f44$dc981c20$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Subject: Re: DSL PPPoE with 2 NICs Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:02:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ted writes: > One of the biggest advantages of vi is that it > permits extremely efficient use of the bandwidth, > as it allows the remote terminal or terminal > emulation to handle jobs like moving blocks of > text around in a cut-and-paste operation, etc. True. I'm constantly pinning my 100 Mbps, two-machine LAN against the wall with my typing speed using less efficient editors. > ... wait until the day comes that you need > to edit a single config file on a system that's > 500 miles away and behind a dedicated dialup > modem on a phone line that is routed through a cow > pasture and can only handle 28.8k Well, hey, if it's East Electronics, they will have already foreseen this and installed fiber between the administrator and the cow-pasture system, so that won't be a problem ... right? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message