From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 9 13:10:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B138E16A4CE for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7E43D1F for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i49KAG4b061133 for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i49KAGmN061132; Sun, 9 May 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405092010.i49KAGmN061132@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: kern/66382: Panic: mutex "tunmtx" 0xc0792dc0 already initialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Simon L. Nielsen" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 20:10:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/66382; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: anthony.ginepro@laposte.net Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/66382: Panic: mutex "tunmtx" 0xc0792dc0 already initialized Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:05:13 +0200 --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.05.08 13:12:47 +0200, anthony.ginepro@laposte.net wrote: > Kernel panics when loading if_tun module but was already compiled static= ally. I think the current solution is: Don't do that :-). I remember seeing somewhere that there is a general problem with loading a modules when the same code is compiled into the kernel, and that it is being worked on. I'm not sure if this PR is the general problem, so I won't close the PR, but I wouldn't hold my breath for a fix. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAno75h9pcDSc1mlERApWxAKCMXTmasuWxoQn/fWpVuGfxxNRi/wCfdi44 nsMuQqIpe1bHwvTY7uxLFwI= =Uapx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY--