Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:48:59 +0000 From: Chris Howells <chris@chrishowells.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package Message-ID: <200302081148.59538.chris@chrishowells.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200302080954.31329.will@unfoldings.net> References: <20030207225459.31402381.fbsdq@kuyarov.org> <1044684066.35995.22.camel@localhost> <200302080954.31329.will@unfoldings.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:54, Willie Viljoen wrote: > I disagree. I run KDE 3.1 with all of the bells and wistles turned on on a > Celeron 333, performance compares favourably to Windows XP running on a > coworker's Duron 1300. All I would do before I set that up is to add some > RAM to that system. The Celeron 333 based system I use to run KDE 3.1 has > 320MB of RAM, and I am even considering an upgrade to 512MB. KDE, ever > since 3.0, has been very RAM heavy, I wouldn't run it if I didn't have > atleast 256MB RAM. I developed KDE on a P2/300 for quite some time. Run speed was fine, but=20 compiling KDE is a little painful on this speed of machine -- but that's on= ly=20 really an issue if you are trying to run the latest HEAD development versio= n=20 of KDE. =2D --=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP key: http://chrishowells.co.uk/pgp.txt KDE: http://www.koffice.org, http://printing.kde.org, http://usability.kde.= org =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+RO6rF8Iu1zN5WiwRAsFvAJ9eixdYOh1UMM+Z+gGUtPkL2FFCmQCgn/3z LjfaFyYmH+d2ycW8WJ1b+90=3D =3DVQM9 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302081148.59538.chris>